Information de reference pour ce titreAccession Number: | 00005792-201909200-00076.
|
Author: | Medeiros, Gidyenne Christine Bandeira Silva de Ms a,b,*; Azevedo, Kesley Pablo Morais de Ms b; Mesquita, Gabriella Xavier Barbalho BS a; Lima, Severina Carla Vieira Cunha PhD a,c; Silva, David Franciole de Oliveira Ms b; Pimenta, Isac Davidson Santiago Fernandes BS b; Goncalves, Ana Katherine da Silveira PhD d; Lyra, Clelia de Oliveira PhD a,b; Piuvezam, Grasiela PhD b,e
|
Institution: | (a)Department of Nutrition (b)Postgraduate Program in Public Health (c)Postgraduate Program in Nutrition (d)Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences (e)Department of Public Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, Brazil.
|
Title: | Red meat consumption, risk of incidence of cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular mortality, and the dose-response effect: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies.[Article]
|
Source: | Medicine. 98(38):e17271, September 2019.
|
Abstract: | Background: Red and (particularly) processed meats are high in cholesterol and saturated and solid fatty acids. Their consumption is considered one of the risk factors for metabolic disorders. Numerous studies demonstrated a possible association between red meat consumption and cardiovascular disease (CVD). In this protocol, we propose a systematic review of the literature to examine the associations of red meat consumption with CVD incidence and mortality, and explore the potential dose-response relationship.
Methods: We will search MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, SciELO, LILACS, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, Cochrane (CENTRAL), WHOLIS, PAHO, and Embase. We will include prospective epidemiological studies (longitudinal cohort). Risk of bias will be assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS). Four independent researchers will conduct all evaluations. Disagreements will be referred to a fifth reviewer. We will summarize our findings using a narrative approach and tables to describe the characteristics of the included studies. The heterogeneity between trial results will be evaluated using a standard chi-squared test with P < .05. We will conduct the study in accordance with the guideline of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P).
Results: This review will evaluate the association between red meat consumption and incidence of CVD and mortality (primary outcome measures). The secondary outcome measure will include the dose-response effect.
Conclusion: The findings of this systematic review will summarize the latest evidence of the association between red meat consumption and incidence of CVD and mortality and the dose-response effect through a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Registration: PROSPERO CRD42019100914.
Copyright (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
|
Author Keywords: | cardiovascular disease; cardiovascular mortality; processed meat; protocol; red meat; unprocessed red meat.
|
References: | [1]. United States Department of Agriculture. Livestock and Poultry: World Markets and Trade. Pork and Chicken Meat Trade Strengthen, Beef Trade Slackens in 2019; 2018. Available at: https://downloads.usda.library.c...- ouverture dans une nouvelle fenêtre. Accessed November 28, 2018.
[2]. Godfray HCJ, Aveyard P, Garnett T, et al. Meat consumption, health, and the environment. Science 2018;243:1-8.
[3]. World Health Organization. Global health risks: mortality and burden of disease attributable to selected major risks. World Health Organization; 2009:1-62. Available at: https://www.who.int/healthinfo/g...- ouverture dans une nouvelle fenêtre. [Access date August 13, 2019].
[4]. World Health Organization. Noncommunicable Diseases Progress Monitor, 2017. Geneva: World Health Organization 2017:1-231. Available at: https://www.who.int/nmh/publicat...- ouverture dans une nouvelle fenêtre [access date September 10, 2018].
[5]. Billingsley HE, Carbone S, Lavie CJ. Dietary fats and chronic noncommunicable diseases. Nutrients 2018;10:1-6.
[6]. Flock MR, Kris-Etherton PM. Dietary guidelines for americans 2010: implications for cardiovascular disease. Curr Atheroscler Rep 2011;13:499-507.
[7]. Micha R, Michas G, Lajous M, et al. Processing of meats and cardiovascular risk: time to focus on preservatives. BMC Med 2013;11:136.
[8]. Micha R, Wallace SK, Mozaffarian D. Red and processed meat consumption and risk of incident coronary heart disease, stroke, and diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation 2010;121:2271-83.
[9]. de Oliveira Otto MC, Alonso A, Lee D-H, et al. Dietary intakes of zinc and heme iron from red meat, but not from other sources, are associated with greater risk of metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease. J Nutr 2012;142:526-33.
[10]. Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev 2015;4:1.
[11]. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 2009;6:1-28.
[12]. Wells GA, Shea B, O'Connel D, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) for assessing the quailty of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa Hosp Res Inst; 2015. Available at: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clin...- ouverture dans une nouvelle fenêtre [access date March 28, 2018].
[13]. World Cancer Research Fund International, American Institute for Cancer Research. Meat, fish and dairy products and the risk of cancer 2018. Continuous Update Project Expert Report 2018:1-78. Available at: https://www.wcrf.org/sites/defau...- ouverture dans une nouvelle fenêtre [access date February 25, 2018].
[14]. Micha R, Michas G, Mozaffarian D. Unprocessed red and processed meats and risk of coronary artery disease and type 2 diabetes - an updated review of the evidence. Curr Atheroscler Rep 2012;14:515-24.
[15]. Bechthold A, Boeing H, Schwedhelm C, et al. Food groups and risk of coronary heart disease, stroke and heart failure: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2019;59:1071-90.
[16]. Schwingshackl L, Schwedhelm C, Hoffmann G, et al. Food groups and risk of all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Am J Clin Nutr 2017;105:1462-73.
[17]. Zhao J, Lyu C, Gao J, et al. Dietary fat intake and endometrial cancer risk: a dose response meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016;95:e4121.
|
Language: | English.
|
Document Type: | Research Article: Study Protocol Systematic Review.
|
Journal Subset: | Nursing. Clinical Medicine. Health Professions. Pharmacology.
|
ISSN: | 0025-7974
|
NLM Journal Code: | mny, 2985248r
|
DOI Number: | https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.00...- ouverture dans une nouvelle fenêtre
|
Annotation(s) | |
|
|