Influence of acute normovolaemic haemodilution on the dose-response relationship and time course of action of cisatracurium besylate.
Dahaba, A. A. 1,*; Wang, G. 2; Xu, X. 2; Liu, X. 2; Wu, X. 2; Bornemann, H. 1; Metzler, H. 1
[Article]
BJA: British Journal of Anaesthesia.
98(3):342-346, March 2007.
(Format: HTML, PDF)
Background: Acute normovolaemic haemodilution (ANH) is an efficacious blood conservation strategy aiming at avoiding allogeneic blood transfusion. ANH was shown to increase the potency of vecuronium, atracurium, and rocuronium. The aim of our study was to investigate whether cisatracurium potency is altered with ANH.
Methods: Using the Relaxometer mechanomyograph, we compared cisatracurium dose-response relationship and time course of action in 60 patients randomly allocated to the ANH or control groups. Patients in each group were randomly allocated to receive one of three cisatracurium doses (30, 40, 50 [micro]g kg-1) followed by a second supplemental dose to reach a total of 100 [micro]g kg-1.
Results: ANH did not result in a significant shift in cisatracurium log dose-probit dose-response curve. There was no significant difference in mean (95% confidence intervals) ED50, ED90, and ED95 (effective doses required for 50, 90, and 95% first twitch depression) between the ANH group [29.5 (27-32), 50.4 (47.4-53.4), 58.7 (55.3-62) [micro]g kg-1] and the control group [28.2 (25.3-31), 47.6 (44.9-50.3), 55.3 (52.5-58.1) [micro]g kg-1], whereas there was no difference in mean (SD) Dur25 and Dur0.8 (time until 25% first twitch and 0.8 train-of-four ratio recoveries) between the ANH group [40.8 (5.9), 64.7 (8.4) min] and the control group [42.2 (7.6), 66.5 (10.7) min].
Conclusions: Our results demonstrated that unlike other previously reported neuromuscular blocking drugs, ANH did not alter cisatracurium potency. Thus, cisatracurium would be the neuromuscular blocking drug of choice in patients who undergo surgery with ANH, as no dose adjustments are required.
(C) The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anesthesia 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.