Information de reference pour ce titreAccession Number: | 01445393-201406000-00015.
|
Author: | Mordenfeld, Arne DDS 1, 2, 3; Albrektsson, Tomas MD, PhD 4, 3; Hallman, Mats DDS, PhD 1, 2
|
Institution: | Consultant Professor Associate professor (1) Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Public Health Service, Gavle, Sweden (2) Centre for Research and Development, Uppsala University/Gavleborg County Council, Gavleborg, Sweden (3) Department of Materials Science & Technology, Malmo University, Malmo, Sweden (4) Department of Biomaterials, Institute for Clinical Sciences, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden
|
Title: | |
Source: | Clinical Implant Dentistry & Related Research. 16(3):435-446, June 2014.
|
Abstract: | Background: There is a need for prospective, long-term follow-up studies of implants placed after maxillary sinus floor augmentation (MSFA).
Purpose: The aim of the present study was to determine whether deprotenized bovine bone (DPBB) used for MSFA may result in long-term stability of placed dental implants.
Material and Methods: Fourteen of the 20 patients included in the study were followed throughout the 10 years study period. These patients had 53 implants placed in 22 (6 unilateral and 8 bilateral) maxillary sinuses augmented with a mixture of 80% DPBB and 20% autogenous bone (80:20), and 15 implants placed in non-grafted sites. Clinical and radiographic examinations of the implants and grafts were performed.
Results: After 10 years of functional loading 15 of the initially placed 108 implants had been lost giving a cumulative survival rate of 86%. The mean marginal bone loss was 1.6 +/- 1.0 mm. There were no statistically significant differences in marginal bone level, pocket depth, or ISQ-values between implants placed in residual or grafted bone or between smokers or non-smokers at 10 years follow-up. There was a statistically significant reduction (p < .01) in graft height between 3 months and 2 years but no further significant reduction up to 10 years.
Conclusions: The first 2 years after placement of implants with turned surfaces placed in sites after sinus floor augmentation with DPBB and autogenous bone seem to be critical for implant survival. At 10 years follow-up, the remaining implants presented excellent clinical and radiological results regardless of smoking habits or implant sites (augmented or residual bone).
(C) 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
|
Author Keywords: | clinical study; dental implants; deproteinized bovine bone; sinus floor augmentation.
|
References: | 1. Hallman M, Sennerby L, Zetterqvist L, Lundgren S. A 3-year prospective follow-up study of implant-supported fixed prostheses in patients subjected to maxillary sinus floor augmentation with a 80:20 mixture of deproteinized bovine bone and autogenous bone Clinical, radiographic and resonance frequency analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2005; 34:273-280.
2. Valentini P, Abensur DJ. Maxillary sinus grafting with anorganic bovine bone: a clinical report of long-term results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2003; 18:556-560.
3. de Vicente JC, Hernandez-Vallejo G, Brana-Abascal P, Pena I. Maxillary sinus augmentation with autologous bone harvested from the lateral maxillary wall combined with bovine-derived hydroxyapatite: clinical and histologic observations. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2010; 21:430-438.
4. Aghaloo TL, Moy PK. Which hard tissue augmentation techniques are the most successful in furnishing bony support for implant placement? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2007; 22(Suppl):49-70.
5. Tong DC, Rioux K, Drangsholt M, Beirne OR. A review of survival rates for implants placed in grafted maxillary sinuses using meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1998; 13:175-182.
6. Peleg M, Garg AK, Mazor Z. Predictability of simultaneous implant placement in the severely atrophic posterior maxilla: a 9-year longitudinal experience study of 2132 implants placed into 731 human sinus grafts. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2006; 21:94-102.
7. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Rees J, et al. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: augmentation procedures of the maxillary sinus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2010 Mar 17; (3): CD008397.
8. Mordenfeld A, Hallman M, Johansson CB, Albrektsson T. Histological and histomorphometrical analyses of biopsies harvested 11 years after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with deproteinized bovine and autogenous bone. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2010; 21:961-970.
9. Hallman M, Thor A. Bone substitutes and growth factors as an alternative/complement to autogenous bone for grafting in implant dentistry. Periodontol 2000, 2008; 47:172-192.
10. Schlegel KA, Fichtner G, Schultze-Mosgau S, Wiltfang J. Histologic findings in sinus augmentation with autogenous bone chips versus a bovine bone substitute. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2003; 18:53-58.
11. Sartori S, Silvestri M, Forni F, Icaro Cornaglia A, Tesei P, Cattaneo V. Ten-year follow-up in a maxillary sinus augmentation using anorganic bovine bone (Bio-Oss). A case report with histomorphometric evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2003; 14:369-372.
12. Tadjoedin ES, de Lange GL, Bronckers AL, Lyaruu DM, Burger EH. Deproteinized cancellous bovine bone (Bio-Oss) as bone substitute for sinus floor elevation. A retrospective, histomorphometrical study of five cases. J Clin Periodontol, 2003; 30:261-270.
13. Valentini P, Abensur D, Wenz B, Peetz M, Schenk R. Sinus grafting with porous bone mineral (Bio-Oss) for implant placement: a 5-year study on 15 patients. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2000; 20:245-253.
14. Wallace SS, Froum SJ. Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review. Ann Periodontol, 2003; 8:328-343.
15. Pjetursson BE, Tan WC, Zwahlen M, Lang NP. A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation. J Clin Periodontol, 2008; 35:216-240.
16. Boyne PJ, James RA. Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg, 1980; 38:613-616.
17. Hallman M, Cederlund A, Lindskog S, Lundgren S, Sennerby L. A clinical histologic study of bovine hydroxyapatite in combination with autogenous bone and fibrin glue for maxillary sinus floor augmentation. Results after 6 to 8 months of healing. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2001; 12:135-143.
18. Chiapasco M, Zaniboni M, Boisco M. Augmentation procedures for the rehabilitation of deficient edentulous ridges with oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2006; 17(Suppl 2):136-159.
19. Del Fabbro M, Rosano G, Taschieri S. Implant survival rates after maxillary sinus augmentation. Eur J Oral Sci, 2008; 116:497-506.
20. Graziani F, Donos N, Needleman I, Gabriele M, Tonetti M. Comparison of implant survival following sinus floor augmentation procedures with implants placed in pristine posterior maxillary bone: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2004; 15:677-682.
21. Tan WC, Lang NP, Zwahlen M, Pjetursson BE. A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation. Part II: transalveolar technique. J Clin Periodontol, 2008; 35:241-254.
22. Balshe AA, Assad DA, Eckert SE, Koka S, Weaver AL. A retrospective study of the survival of smooth- and rough-surface dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2009; 24:1113-1118.
23. Balshe AA, Eckert SE, Koka S, Assad DA, Weaver AL. The effects of smoking on the survival of smooth- and rough-surface dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2008; 23:1117-1122.
24. Ferreira CE, Novaes AB, Haraszthy VI, Bittencourt M, Martinelli CB, Luczyszyn SM. A clinical study of 406 sinus augmentations with 100% anorganic bovine bone. J Periodontol, 2009; 80:1920-1927.
25. Tarnow DP, Wallace SS, Froum SJ, Rohrer MD, Cho SC. Histologic and clinical comparison of bilateral sinus floor elevations with and without barrier membrane placement in 12 patients: part 3 of an ongoing prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2000; 20:117-125.
26. Wallace SS, Froum SJ, Cho SC, et al. Sinus augmentation utilizing anorganic bovine bone (Bio-Oss) with absorbable and nonabsorbable membranes placed over the lateral window: histomorphometric and clinical analyses. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2005; 25:551-559.
27. Hanisch O, Lozada JL, Holmes RE, Calhoun CJ, Kan JY, Spiekermann H. Maxillary sinus augmentation prior to placement of endosseous implants: a histomorphometric analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1999; 14:329-336.
28. Becktor JP, Eckert SE, Isaksson S, Keller EE. The influence of mandibular dentition on implant failures in bone-grafted edentulous maxillae. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2002; 17:69-77.
29. Carmagnola D, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. The effect of a fibrin glue on the integration of Bio-Oss with bone tissue. A experimental study in labrador dogs. J Clin Periodontol, 2002; 29:377-383.
30. Kim WB, Kim SG, Lim SC, Kim YK, Park SN. Effect of Tisseel on bone healing with particulate dentin and plaster of Paris mixture. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2010; 109:e34-e40.
31. Sunden-Pikner S. Radiographic follow up analysis of Branemark dental implants. PhD, University of Gothenburg, 2008.
32. Hatano N, Shimizu Y, Ooya K. A clinical long-term radiographic evaluation of graft height changes after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with a 2:1 autogenous bone/xenograft mixture and simultaneous placement of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2004; 15:339-345.
33. Zijderveld SA, Schulten EA, Aartman IH, ten, Bruggenkate CM. Long-term changes in graft height after maxillary sinus floor elevation with different grafting materials: radiographic evaluation with a minimum follow-up of 4.5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2009; 20:691-700.
34. Kim YK, Yun PY, Kim SG, Kim BS, Ong JL. Evaluation of sinus bone resorption and marginal bone loss after sinus bone grafting and implant placement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2009; 107:e21-e28.
35. Jensen T, Schou S, Svendsen PA, et al. Volumetric changes of the graft after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with Bio-Oss and autogenous bone in different ratios: a radiographic study in minipigs. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2012; 23:902-910.
36. Sbordone L, Levin L, Guidetti F, Sbordone C, Glikman A, Schwartz-Arad D. Apical and marginal bone alterations around implants in maxillary sinus augmentation grafted with autogenous bone or bovine bone material and simultaneous or delayed dental implant positioning. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2011; 22:485-491.
37. Khocht A, Janal M, Harasty L, Chang KM. Comparison of direct digital and conventional intraoral radiographs in detecting alveolar bone loss. J Am Dent Assoc, 2003; 134:1468-1475.
38. Tronje G, Welander U, McDavid WD, Morris CR. Image distortion in rotational panoramic radiography. IV. Object morphology; outer contours. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh), 1981; 22:689-696.
|
Language: | English.
|
Document Type: | ARTICLES.
|
Journal Subset: | Health Professions.
|
ISSN: | 1523-0899
|
DOI Number: | https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cid.1...- ouverture dans une nouvelle fenêtre
|
Annotation(s) | |
|
|