Information de reference pour ce titreAccession Number: | 01253108-201831030-00016.
|
Author: | Luig, Thea PhD; Asselin, Jodie PhD; Sharma, Arya M. MD, PhD; Campbell-Scherer, Denise L. MD, PhD
|
Institution: | From Department of Family Medicine, University of Alberta (TL); Department of Anthropology, University of Lethbridge (JA); Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, and Alberta Diabetes Institute, University of Alberta (AMS); Lifelong Learning and Physician Learning Program, Department of Family Medicine, and Alberta Diabetes Institute, University of Alberta (DLCS).
|
Title: | Understanding Implementation of Complex Interventions in Primary Care Teams.[Article]
|
Source: | Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine. 31(3):431-444, May/June 2018.
|
Abstract: | Background: The implementation of interventions to support practice change in primary care settings is complex. Pragmatic strategies, grounded in empiric data, are needed to navigate real-world challenges and unanticipated interactions with context that can impact implementation and outcomes.
Objective: This article uses the example of the "5As Team" randomized control trial to explore implementation strategies to promote knowledge transfer, capacity building, and practice integration, and their interaction within the context of an interdisciplinary primary care team.
Methods: We performed a qualitative evaluation of the implementation process of the 5As Team intervention study, a randomized control trial of a complex intervention in primary care. We conducted thematic analysis of field notes of intervention sessions, log books of the practice facilitation team members, and semistructured interviews with 29 interdisciplinary clinician participants. We used and further developed the Interactive Systems Framework for dissemination and implementation to interpret and structure findings.
Results: Three themes emerged that illuminate interactions between implementation processes, context, and outcomes: (1) facilitating team communication supported collective and individual sense-making and adoption of the innovation, (2) iterative evaluation of the implementation process and real-time feedback-driven adaptions of the intervention proved crucial for sustainable, context-appropriate intervention impact, (3) stakeholder engagement led to both knowledge exchange that contributes to local problem solving and to shaping a clinical context that is supportive to practice change.
Conclusion: Our findings contribute pragmatic strategies that can help practitioners and researchers to navigate interactions between context, intervention, and implementation factors to increase implementation success. We further developed an implementation framework that includes sustained engagement with stakeholders, facilitation of team sense-making, and dynamic evaluation and intervention design as integral parts of complex intervention implementation.
Trial registration: NCT01967797. 18 October 2013
Copyright (C) 2018 by the American Board of Family Medicine.
|
Author Keywords: | Capacity Building; Communication; Implementation Science; Interdisciplinary Studies; Primary Health Care; Problem Solving.
|
References: | 1. Bhasker R. A realist theory of science. 2nd ed. Harvester/Humanities: Sussex and New Jersey; 1978.
2. May CR, Johnson M, Finch T. Implementation, context and complexity. Implement Sci 2016;11: 1-12.
3. Petticrew M. When are complex interventions "complex"? When are simple interventions "simple"? Eur J Public Health 2011;21:397-8.
4. Campbell-Scherer D, Saitz R. Improving reporting and utility of evaluations of complex interventions. Evid Based Med 2015, Nov 25;ebmed-2015-110342.
5. Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q 2004;82:581-629.
6. Murray E, Treweek S, Pope et al. Normalisation process theory: A framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions. BMC Med. 2010;8:63-73.
7. Helfrich C, Weiner B, McKinney M, Minasian L. Determinants of implementation effectiveness: Adapting a framework for complex innovations. Med Care Res Rev 2007;64:279-303.
8. Wandersman A, Duffy J, Flaspohler P, et al. Bridging the gap between prevention research and practice: The interactive systems framework for dissemination and implementation. Am J Community Psychol. 2008;41:(3-4):171-81.
9. Glasziou P, Meats E, Heneghan C, Shepperd S. What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews? BMJ. 2008;336:1472.
10. Abell B, Glasziou P, Hoffmann T. Reporting and replicating trials of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation: do we know what the researchers actually did? Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2015;8:187-94.
11. Dal-Re R, Bracken MB, Ioannidis JPA. Call to improve transparency of trials of non-regulated interventions. BMJ 2015;350:h1323.
12. Pawson R, Greenhalgh T, Harvey G, Walshe K. Realist review-a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. J Health Serv Res Policy 2005;:10:(Suppl 1):21-34.
13. Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci 2015;10:53.
14. Harvey G, Fitzgerald L, Fielden S, et al. The NIHR collaboration for leadership in applied health research and care (CLAHRC) for greater manchester: combining empirical, theoretical and experiential evidence to design and evaluate a large-scale implementation strategy. Implement Sci 2011;6:96.
15. Tabak RG, Khoong EC, Chambers DA, Brownson RC. Bridging research and practice. Am J Prev Med 2012;43:337-50.
16. Meyers DC, Durlak JA, Wandersman A. The quality implementation framework: A synthesis of critical steps in the implementation process. Am J Community Psychol. 2012;50:(3-4):462-80.
17. Kaplan HC, Brady PW, Dritz MC, et al. The influence of context on quality improvement success in health care: A systematic review of the literature. Milbank Q 2010;88:500-59.
18. Ferlie EB, Shortell SM. Improving the quality of health care in the United Kingdom and the United States: A framework for change. Milbank Q 2001;79:281-315.
19. Flaspohler P, Lesesne CA, Puddy RW, Smith E, Wandersman A. Advances in bridging research and practice: Introduction to the second special issue on the interactive system framework for dissemination and implementation. Am J Community Psychol. 2012;50:(3-4):271-81.
20. Brodowski Ml, Counts JM, Gillam RJ, et al. Translating evidence-based policy to practice: A multilevel partnership using the interactive systems framework. Fam Soc J Contemp Soc Serv 2013;94:141-9.
21. Chambers D. The interactive systems framework for dissemination and implementation: Enhancing the opportunity for implementation science. Am J Community Psychol 2012;50:(3-4):282-4.
22. Collins C, Edwards A, Jones P, Kay L, Cox P, Puddy R. A comparison of the interactive systems framework (ISF) for dissemination and implementation and the CDC division of HIV/AIDS prevention's research-to-practice model for behavioral interventions. Am J Community Psychol. 2012;50:(3-4):518-29.
23. Florin P, Friend K, Buka S, Egan C, Barovier L, Amodei B. The interactive systems framework applied to the strategic prevention framework: The Rhode Island experience. Am J Community Psychol. 2012;50:(3-4):402-14.
24. Gregory H, Van Orden O, Jordan L, et al. New directions in capacity building: Incorporating cultural competence into the interactive systems framework. Am J Community Psychol. 2012;50:(3-4):321-33.
25. Halgunseth L, Carmack C, Childs S, Caldwell L, Craig A, Smith E. Using the interactive systems framework in understanding the relation between general program capacity and implementation in afterschool settings. Am J Community Psychol. 2012;50:(3-4):311-20.
26. Lane R, Berkowitz J, Sullivan S, et al. Applying the interactive systems framework to the dissemination and adoption of national and state recommendations for hypertension. Am J Community Psychol. 2012;50:(3-4):541-52.
27. Noonan R, Wilson K, Mercer S. Navigating the road ahead: Public health challenges and the interactive systems framework for dissemination and implementation. Am J Community Psychol. 2012;50:(3-4):572-80.
28. Rapkin B, Weiss E, Lounsbury D, et al. Using the interactive systems framework to support a quality improvement approach to dissemination of evidence-based strategies to promote early detection of breast cancer: Planning a comprehensive dynamic trial. Am J Community Psychol. 2012;50:(3-4):497-517.
29. Ray M, Wilson M, Wandersman A, Meyers D, Katz J. Using a training-of-trainers approach and proactive technical assistance to bring evidence based programs to scale: An operationalization of the interactive systems framework's support system. Am J Community Psychol. 2012;50:(3-4):415-27.
30. Smythe-Leistico K, Young C, Mulvey L, et al. Blending theory with practice: Implementing kindergarten transition using the interactive systems framework. Am J Community Psychol. 2012;50:(3-4):357-69.
31. Ogunleye A, Osunlana A, Asselin J, Cave A, Sharma AM, Campbell-Scherer DL. The 5As team intervention: bridging the knowledge gap in obesity management among primary care practitioners. BMC Res Notes [Internet]. 2015 Dec [cited 2016 Jan 21];8(1). Available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/175...- ouverture dans une nouvelle fenêtre.
32. Osunlana AM, Asselin J, Anderson R, et al. 5As Team obesity intervention in primary care: development and evaluation of shared decision-making weight management tools. Clin Obes. 2015;(4):219.
33. The 5As Team Project [Internet]. [cited 2016 Apr 2]. Available from: http://www.obesitynetwork.ca/5As...- ouverture dans une nouvelle fenêtre.
34. Campbell-Scherer DL, Asselin J, Osunlana AM, et al. Implementation and evaluation of the 5As framework of obesity management in primary care: design of the 5As Team (5AsT) randomized control trial. Implement Sci. 2014;9:78.
35. Asselin J, Osunlana AM, Ogunleye AA, Sharma AM, Campbell-Scherer D. Missing an opportunity: the embedded nature of weight management in primary care. Clin Obes. 2015;Aug 25;5:325-32.
36. Asselin J, Osunlana A, Ogunleye A, Sharma A, Campbell-Scherer D. Challenges in interdisciplinary weight management in primary care: lessons learned from the 5As Team study. Clin Obes. 2016;6:124-32.
37. Asselin J, Salami E, Osunlana AM, et al. Impact of the 5As Team study on clinical practice in primary care obesity management: a qualitative study. CMAJ Open. 2017;Apr 26;5:(2):E322-9.
38. Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, et al. Lost in knowledge translation: Time for a map? J Contin Educ Health Prof 2006;26:13-24.
39. Brauer P, Connor Gorber S, Shaw E, et al. Recommendations for prevention of weight gain and use of behavioural and pharmacologic interventions to manage overweight and obesity in adults in primary care. CMAJ 2015;187:184-95.
40. Gabbay J, Le May A. Practice-based evidence for healthcare: Clinical mindlines. Abingdon, Oxon, UK: Routledge, 2011.
41. Wieringa S, Greenhalgh T. 10 years of mindlines: A systematic review and commentary. Implement Sci 2015;10:45.
42. Wenger E. Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1998.
43. May C, Finch T. Implementing, embedding, and integrating practices: An outline of normalization process theory. Sociology 2009;43:535-54.
44. Lloyd A, Joseph-Williams N, Edwards A, Rix A, Elwyn G. Patchy "coherence": Using normalization process theory to evaluate a multi-faceted shared decision making implementation program (MAGIC). Implement Sci 2013;8:102.
45. Denis J-L, Hebert Y, Langley A, Lozeau D, Trottier L-H. Explaining diffusion patterns for complex health care innovations. Health Care Manage Rev. 2002;27:60-73.
46. Minkler M, Wallerstein N. Community-based participatory research for health: From process to outcomes. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons; 2011;. 758p.
47. Hall BL. From margins to center? The development and purpose of participatory research. Am Sociol 1992;23:15-28.
48. Cornwall A, Jewkes R. What is participatory research? Soc Sci Med 1995;41:1667-76.
|
Language: | English.
|
Document Type: | Original Research.
|
Journal Subset: | Clinical Medicine.
|
ISSN: | 1557-2625
|
DOI Number: | https://dx.doi.org/10.3122/jabfm...- ouverture dans une nouvelle fenêtre
|
Annotation(s) | |
|
|