Developing Instruments for Cross-Cultural Psychiatric Research.
FLAHERTY, JOSEPH A. M.D.; GAVIRIA, F. MOISES M.D.; PATHAK, DEV M.D.; MITCHELL, TIMOTHY M.D.; WINTROB, RONALD M.D.; RICHMAN, JUDITH A. Ph.D.; BIRZ, SUSAN B.S.
Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease.
176(5):260-263, May 1988.
(Format: HTML, PDF)
The growth of cross-cultural psychiatry is now occurring at a time when psychiatry in general is emphasizing diagnostic clarity and the use of quantifiable and reliable methods of collecting clinical and research data. It is now imperative that cross-cultural psychiatry also examine its methods for developing instruments for use in cross-cultural research. This paper outlines a method for developing instruments designed in one culture for use in a second, and particular attention is given to cross-cultural validity or equivalence. Five types of equivalence are enumerated and defined: content, semantic, technical, criterion, and conceptual equivalence. These concepts are illustrated by examples from the authors' experience in research on internal migrants in Peru.
(C) Williams & Wilkins 1988. All Rights Reserved.