Screening for Cervical Cancer Precursors With p16/Ki-67 Dual-Stained Cytology: Results of the PALMS Study.
Ikenberg, Hans; Bergeron, Christine; Schmidt, Dietmar; Griesser, Henrik; Alameda, Francisco; Angeloni, Claudio; Bogers, Johannes; Dachez, Roger; Denton, Karin; Hariri, Jalil; Keller, Thomas; von Knebel Doeberitz, Magnus; Neumann, Heinrich H.; Puig-Tintore, Luis M.; Sideri, Mario; Rehm, Susanne; Ridder, Ruediger; for the PALMS Study Group
[Article]
Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
105(20):1550-1557, October 16, 2013.
(Format: HTML, PDF)
Background: Pap cytology is known to be more specific but less sensitive than testing for human papillomavirus (HPV) for the detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2 ). We assessed whether p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology, a biomarker combination indicative of transforming HPV infections, can provide high sensitivity for CIN2 in screening while maintaining high specificity. Results were compared with Pap cytology and HPV testing.
Methods: A total of 27349 women 18 years or older attending routine cervical cancer screening were prospectively enrolled in five European countries. Pap cytology, p16/Ki-67 immunostaining, and HPV testing were performed on all women. Positive test results triggered colposcopy referral, except for women younger than 30 years with only positive HPV test results. Presence of CIN2 on adjudicated histology was used as the reference standard. Two-sided bias-corrected McNemar P values were determined.
Results: The p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology positivity rates were comparable with the prevalence of abnormal Pap cytology results and less than 50% of the positivity rates observed for HPV testing. In women of all ages, dual-stained cytology was more sensitive than Pap cytology (86.7% vs 68.5%; P < .001) for detecting CIN2 , with comparable specificity (95.2% vs 95.4%; P = .15). The relative performance of the tests was similar in both groups of women: younger than age 30 and 30 years or older. HPV testing in women 30 years or older was more sensitive than dual-stained cytology (93.3% vs 84.7%; P = .03) but less specific (93.0% vs 96.2%; P < .001).
Conclusions: The p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology combines superior sensitivity and noninferior specificity over Pap cytology for detecting CIN2 . It suggests a potential role of dual-stained cytology in screening, especially in younger women where HPV testing has its limitations.
(C) Copyright Oxford University Press 2013.
